EP2014 / Federalism

JEF Europe’s resolution: “Facing the rise of Eurosceptic Parties”

Below is the text of a resolution I have co-written and which was adopted by JEF Europe’s Federal Committee at the end of March. Please, do not hesitate to spread the text to all those fighting for the European integration and against the rise of Eurosceptic parties.

Pierre-Antoine KLETHI

Recalling the beneficial effects of the European project for European citizens, in particular the peace and prosperity brought by an ever-closer Union;

Witnessing growing support for Eurosceptic parties in several Member States;

Observing a growing general distrust of citizens towards many political institutions and politics which also affects European institutions;

Bearing in mind that the unresolved economic crisis continues to add to anti-European sentiments all over Europe;

Convinced of the utmost necessity of a European solution to tackle the most pressing challenges of our time, in particular: unemployment; excessive debt; insufficiently democratic governance; and the lack of trust in political institutions.

Therefore, JEF Europe

Stresses the need to continue to address the rise of Eurosceptic parties, acknowledging the severity of the situation – by employing factual arguments and focusing on the content of concrete policy proposals;

Underlines the diversity of Eurosceptic parties and the fragility of their attempted alliance, and consequently believes that adequately tackling the rise of Eurosceptic parties requires addressing the specific arguments of each of these political parties;

Commits to forming partnerships with other organisations – whose main focus is not necessarily European integration – who are opposed to Eurosceptic parties for reasons other than the fact that they are Eurosceptic so as to make known to the public that these parties are a problem for a variety of reasons;

Insists that the European political parties shall have a real pan-European campaign ahead of European elections, that forces Eurosceptic parties to detail their proposals and the citizens will be presented a true choice between different policies;

Asks all European leaders in the political, the public and the private spheres, as well as the media, to reaffirm the benefits brought by European integration and to point out the democratic innovations related to this year’s election, in particular the closer link between the choice of the President of the European Commission and the result of the elections;

Demands that civil society, national governments and European institutions adequately inform citizens about the new powers and democratic legitimacy the European Parliament has gained and how it has made use of it;

Suggests that they also explain the outreach and the role of European policies and politics, especially of the European Parliament’s action, for the European citizens’ daily life;

Will present, with a spirit of constructive criticism, its preferred solutions to make the EU more democratic and progress towards a federal Union;

Urges all citizens, since Europe is built by the people, to help in implementing the above mentioned recommendations and to use these elections to shape Europe the way they want it to be.

2 thoughts on “JEF Europe’s resolution: “Facing the rise of Eurosceptic Parties”

  1. Interesting comments from Van Rompuy who states he does not even believe in the voting process for the EU president. That say’s all you need to know about the eurocrat mindset in Brussels, keep the voters dumb, and we will choose from behind closed doors?

    All this is a God send for Farage in the #EP2014 euro elections. Then just look at the EU Pres candidates, all are on the left really. Bove and Keller are Green, so we know where they stand, big green taxes.Tsipras is a communist, enough said. Schulz is a socialist, Ed Miliband and Labour are part of the Schulz PES, but you will not find Ed Miliband shaking hands with Schulz in the next couple of weeks in run up to euro #EP2014 elections. Verhofstadt is a liberal (actually I think he is the best speaker) but a staunch EU federalist. That only leaves Juncker who is centre right EPP, who is about as inspiring as watching paint dry.

    Farage will be getting their big ballot box X on election day, and looking at the choice on offer, I cannot really blame them.

    • Van Rompuy’s comment was unusual and quite stupid. I agree that it was disastrous, and he was duly criticised by lots of people.
      If I were British, I guess I would go for the Lib-Dems and Verhofstadt, since Juncker’s EPP is not present in the UK.
      Juncker may not be the greatest showman, but you cannot have a candidate who fits every country’s style: Juncker is more “German style”: rather restrained and betting on competence and seriousness rather than lyrical speeches.

      Farage is certainly not a solution for UK voters. His record in the EP shows how useless he is and how he does not defend the interests of his constituents. Moreover, every serious study shows that the UK is much better off in rather than out the EU. Campaigning for leaving the EU therefore damages the UK economy prospects.
      In addition, Farage simply is the “presentable face” of an unpresentable party. Unfortunately, people do not realise this.
      Finally, even if Farage presents himself as against the establishment, he is in fact the worst face of the establishment: the kind of politicians who take the money but do not work much during their mandate.
      It would be sad if UK voters listen to the one who speaks best instead of to those who have the best ideas…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s